Late last year we were all subjected to fear mongering on the H1N1 issue. The induced fears were sufficient so as to justify the massive expenditure on H1N1 vaccines that may or may not have been effective in preventing the flu, but also caused a large number of adverse reactions. Our government agencies, including the Ottawa Public Health Unit all told us the vaccine was safe. The media served their role as propagandists very well and parroted the claims of safety without performing any due diligence at all. I called Glaxo Smith Kline myself to find out what was in this vaccine.

Then I called Ottawa public health.

Then I called the Public Health Agency of Canada and all I got were "information officers that had been engaged by PHAC to staff the general inquiries line. Listen while I ask them about the safety of the vaccine.

Global TV reported that our H1N1 vaccine was authorized based on the information from a single clinical trial in Belgium that involved 130 people. The public health agency of Canada let Glaxo Smith Kline experiment on the Canadian population with it's brand new adjuvant AS03. To make matters worse Chief Public Health Officer Dr. David Butler-Jones said the federal government will provide lawsuit protection against swine flu vaccine maker GlaxoSmithKline if there would be future side effects. Ottawa public health did nothing to protect you either. Feeling betrayed yet? You should. 

I knew that people were not being properly informed. I went to a vaccination clinic in Ottawa and had to find out if they were finally providing people with sufficient information to achieve informed consent. Especially since some of these chemicals already have some negative consequences. Did anyone at Ottawa Public Health do their homework? Would ignoring this information be misconduct of a public health official? Would disregarding this gross negligence? Either way the tax payers in Ottawa certainly didn't get their money's worth from Ottawa public health. You pay them and they lead you like lambs to the slaughter. Don't worry though, they sleep well confident in the knowledge that "it wasn't their job" to do anything different.

The H1N1 vaccine had an antigen (think antivirus) and an adjuvant. This is not the first time we have made a vaccine nor an antigen, but it is the first time we are using the AS03 adjuvant system. The results of Canada's first clinical trial of AS03 should be available in the summer of 2010. While the media kept repeating the message that the vaccine was safe; information indicating that the h1n1 vaccine may cause genetic damage, cancer, arthritis, multiple sclerosis, lump and sterility for prepubescent females was readily available.

Now that several months have passed we get to hear about the H1N1 vaccine adverse reactions. Notice how these people almost have to fight the medical establishment in order for their symptoms to be recorded as an adverse event. Canada's "excellent post vaccination monitoring program" is a farse! Your tax dollars at work.

Do you want an honest politician?

Are you sure?

Then you need someone that has the ability to face pressure and still make moral decisions. Something that is more rare than we would initially think. The Milgram Experiment showed us that 65% of people are willing to kill a random stranger just because a guy in a white lab coat said he should continue with the experiement. Now we have a new incarnation of the Milgram Experiment from France and when ordered to kill a random stranger it appears that over 80% of people will kill if they are doing so publicly under hot studio lights and cameras.